Cannonbridge starts with an unusual premise – that there is a writer, Matthew Cannonbridge, the
greatest author of the Victorian age. The narrative breaks into two strands – the first,
following Cannonbridge and his exploits through the Victorian period, and the
second, a modern day piece centred on a lecturer of literature, who becomes
convinced that Matthew Cannonbridge never actually existed.
The Cannonbridge sections are written in a sort of
faux-gothic style, which actually works very well, given the time period and
the subject. It may be my imagination suggesting that the prose changed
slightly to match the tone of the various authors Cannonbridge meets during his
travels, but it wouldn’t surprise me either – this is a text very aware of
itself. The prose, of these sections feels almost liquid, and makes for a very
satisfying read. The actual events of the story are a bit…vague. Cannonbridge
surfaces in times and places, seemingly near to other literary characters, and
impacts on their lives – with variable results, though with a constant – that the
man feels himself pursued, though by what isn’t entirely clear. The portrayal
of Cannonbridge is largely done through action, rather than introspection – his
supporting cast drawn well, but perhaps not with enough depth in some cases.
The more modern sections are written as a bit of a potboiler
thriller, following the unlikely hero of Doctor Toby Judd, an expert in
Cannonbridge literature who comes to suspect that Cannonbridge is actually an
elaborate literary hoax, and notices
that other people who think this way appear to be dying rather precipitously.
From there, the narrative carries a fair bit of action, and these portions are
perhaps more obviously a page-turner than those set in Victorian England.
Curiously though, the action is laced with periods of introspection, especially
in the earlier segments from Judd – and these are quite whimsical, lyrical,
and, as things progress, a bit depressing – presumably as intended. Again, the
supporting cast is decent enough, though at times a bit convenient, and with
motivations not fully explored.
The two threads culminate together at the close of the book,
with results which, frankly, were rather unexpected – a change in tone and
direction. Still, it was all quite plausible, and interesting enough – but not
as effective, I think, as the rest of the text. The close had surprise, but not
impact, and seemed determined to stack reveals on top of each other, perhaps to
the detriment of the book as a whole.
Overall then, a pleasant read, with some interesting ideas,
and a solid, occasionally exceptional narrative, with a conclusion which may
delight or disgust in equal measure.
No comments:
Post a Comment